131. Are You Severely Underpaid? Using the VALUE Framework to Get Out of the Career Clearance Section, w/Candyce Hunt
Sep 30, 2025
Get Off the Clearance Rack: Use the VALUE Framework to Claim Full-Price Worth
Underpaid doesn’t always arrive as a single low offer; it often sneaks in through a pattern—saying yes too fast, taking on more without matching pay, waiting for permission to negotiate.
In a conversation with Candyce Hunt, the “career clearance rack” came to life as a striking metaphor: when work isn’t merchandised, when value stays in the back room, roles get marked down—and the market starts believing the markdown. This segment turns that insight into a practical framework so compensation matches contribution, negotiation feels normal, and decisions begin to reflect full worth rather than old scripts.
Remember, interviews and offers are business transactions, not favors; the company expects a professional counter. Underpayment is a pattern, not a moment—recognize it, interrupt it, replace it.
Today's the day to take those steps.
Listen on your favorite podcast app: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Are You on the Career Clearance Rack?
Several signals show up consistently when compensation lags reality.
First, negotiating stops. Offers arrive, the number lands poorly, a knot forms in the stomach—and acceptance happens anyway. Second, workload expands while compensation stays flat, a dynamic especially common among women who self-select out of applying unless every box is checked. Third, decisions are made without a seat at the table; influence declines, visibility narrows, and the story about value is told by everyone but the person doing the work.
These signs aren’t a moral failing; they are feedback that voice, visibility, and negotiation posture need a reset.
-
Not negotiating becomes the strongest evidence of under-earning.
-
More work, same pay is a structural mismatch, not a badge of honor.
-
No seat in decisions means the story of value isn’t being authored directly.
Why It Happens: Limiting Deposits and Invisible Scripts
Underpayment often traces back to “limiting deposits”—moments or messages that shrink stature without being noticed. A single comment from a leader (“you’re about to be rolling in dough”) can quietly downgrade identity from professional peer to subordinate, making future counters feel presumptuous.
Early lowball offers that get accepted, even when the number feels wrong in the body, normalize discounting. Over time, that becomes a loop: hush the signal, rationalize the trade-off, accept the carrot, postpone the conversation. Naming this pattern with precision breaks the trance.
The first step is not “be louder”; it is “tell the truth about what has been internalized and why.” Once the story is accurate, action gets easier and more effective.
-
Trust the body’s signal when an offer lands heavy; that weight is data.
-
Replace deposits with decisions: the past was training, not destiny.
Rethink Negotiation as a Business Conversation
It's really nothing personal; companies negotiate every hour of every day: budgets, timelines, vendors, talent. Offers are rarely the top of the salary band; hiring teams manage P&Ls and expect a counter.
Did you know? Only about a third of candidates negotiate at all, which means many roles close below what the market—and the organization—would have paid. Treat the process as two-sided diligence. Ask for 48–72 hours to review, gather data, and return with a clear, confident counter. Declining to negotiate is not politeness; it is a quiet subsidy.
The person extending the offer likely negotiated their own package; doing the same communicates professional caliber, not greed.
-
Ask for time as standard: “Appreciate the offer—returning with a response in 48–72 hours.”
-
Expect room in the band and be ready to name the number and why it fits.
-
Remember the statistic: only 33% negotiate; recruiters anticipate counters.
The VALUE Framework: High-Level Map
The VALUE framework converts fuzzy intention into repeatable action:
-
V — Value Documentation: inventory accomplishments, metrics, and kudos so worth is visible, not merely felt.
-
A — Assert Clear Boundaries: define minimums, role scope, and non-negotiables before the conversation.
-
L — Loudly Communicate: speak expectations and evidence plainly; no hints, no hedging.
-
U — Unapologetically Ask / Uplift Others: request what the role warrants and help peers do the same.
-
E — Evidence: keep receipts—ongoing proof that impact matches or exceeds the pay being requested.
This cycle is continuous. Evidence strengthens the next negotiation; clear boundaries prevent slide-backs; loud, unapologetic requests reinforce identity at full price. Let's go through them.
V — Value Documentation: Make Worth Legible
Memory is, unfortunately, a poor archivist.
Keep a living record of impact—quantitative results and qualitative testimonies. Quantitative shows how decisions changed outcomes (revenue, cost, risk, time, satisfaction). Qualitative reveals how leadership, collaboration, and judgment affected people and culture. Capture both in real time. Performance reviews alone are not enough; a private “brag file” with metrics, emails, and stakeholder quotes becomes the backbone of promotion cases and negotiation counters. When numbers are scarce, reconstruct outcomes from available signals: before/after snapshots, trend shifts, escalations prevented, customers retained.
Documentation doesn’t inflate value; it renders it visible.
-
Build a two-tab archive: metrics (quant) and testimonials (qual).
-
Translate tasks into outcomes: what got faster, cheaper, safer, or better?
-
Use exact language from kudos; it’s ready-made evidence.
A — Assert Clear Boundaries: Set the Floor Before You Walk In
Every company has boundaries—budgets, policies, guardrails. Careers need them too.
Decide the compensation floor based on market data and documented impact; decide acceptable scope, title, and growth path; decide limits on trade-offs. Hybrid days or flexible schedules are not payment; they are features of the job. Advancement should not require sacrificing fair pay. Enter negotiations with a written boundary statement that sets the floor, names the ideal, and defines deal-breakers. Boundary clarity beats charisma; it reduces wobble in the room and eliminates the need to improvise under pressure.
-
Write a boundary brief: floor, target, non-negotiables, rationale.
-
Separate perks from pay; flexibility is additive, not a substitute.
-
Keep tone steady: firm and respectful signals professional maturity.
L — Loudly Communicate: Say the Number and the Why
Value can’t be hinted into existence.
Name the ask and anchor it to evidence: “Based on market data, scope expansion, and documented outcomes, the target is X.” Loud doesn’t mean loud volume; it means clear language. Replace hedges (“maybe thinking,” “if it’s not too much”) with direct sentences that hold space for a counter.
Loud communication also starts months before offers: narrate progress in 1:1s, request development assignments aligned to the next scope, and publish concise updates that tie work to business outcomes. Visibility is merchandising; without it, strong work remains in the back room.
-
Use clean anchors: market benchmarks + impact proof → target compensation.
-
Own development conversations; ask for scope that matches the role wanted next.
-
Replace hints with statements; clarity is kindness to both sides.
U — Unapologetically Ask & Uplift Others: Courage and Community
Unapologetic asks communicate readiness.
The language is simple: “The ask is X,” followed by the evidence. No over-explaining.
Pair that with advocacy for others—share salary intel, model counters, and challenge lowball patterns when leading teams. Advocacy sharpens negotiation muscles and multiplies impact beyond a single offer. It also changes the local market: when more people counter confidently, discounting becomes harder to normalize. The habit of uplifting turns negotiation into culture, not just an individual tactic.
-
State the ask cleanly and stop talking—let silence do work.
-
Mentor peers through their counters; create a pay-positive network effect.
-
Advocate in hiring: push back on low offers to your own candidates.
E — Evidence: Close the Loop and Keep the Receipts
Evidence isn’t a one-time file; it’s a system.
Build five-minute daily or weekly reflections: wins captured, lessons learned, stakeholders influenced, measurable shifts. Book short, recurring touchpoints with leaders to align on outcomes and surface misalignments early. When surprise opportunities appear—“considering you for X”—the receipts are ready. Evidence turns aspiration into credibility and counters into agreements. It also de-personalizes negotiations: the ask is not a feeling; it’s a documented throughline of contribution and scope.
-
Establish a cadence: micro-reflections + monthly outcome summaries.
-
Bring the binder to conversations—metrics, testimonials, artifacts.
-
Use evidence to justify walk-aways when floors aren’t met.
“Yes at First Sight” and the Power of Pausing
Reflexive acceptance—“yes at first sight”—keeps careers on markdown. It's almost instinct.
So, learn to pause by default.
A 48–72 hour window allows for market checks, mentor consults, and alignment of ask to boundaries. Use the time to write the counter verbatim and rehearse it out loud. The pause is not a stall tactic; it is standard practice in business. Two executives would never sign a contract on first sight; professionals shouldn’t accept complex offers that way either. The pause also re-centers the body after the adrenaline spike of an offer, ensuring the decision comes from clarity, not chemistry.
-
Script the counter during the pause; precision beats improvisation.
-
Add small asks beyond base pay (sign-on, review timeline, scope clarity).
Business, Not Personal: Ditch the Invisible Social Contract
Many professionals treat the company like a person and the offer like a favor, and it's normal. But that framing fuels guilt and silence. Organizations allocate resources; individuals advocate needs and value.
When a leader says, “there’s no budget,” treat it as data, not a verdict. Options remain: negotiate non-cash levers, time the next review, or treat the answer as a signal to explore the market. No one is the villain in a transparent negotiation; both sides choose based on constraints and goals.
Detaching from the invisible social contract returns agency without burning bridges.
-
Translate “no” into options: timing, levers, or external exploration.
-
Hold goodwill and boundaries at the same time; both can be true.
When Switching Companies Is the Cleanest Reset
The clearance-rack metaphor includes a hard truth: once a price is anchored low, internal correction can be slow. Sometimes the fastest path to full-price positioning is a new employer. This isn’t disloyal; it’s rational. New contexts allow re-merchandising of the same capability with premium framing—proper visibility, aligned scope, and a compensation structure unburdened by legacy discounts.
The VALUE cycle still applies; it just lands on a fresh shelf where the story of worth starts at the right number.
-
Treat external interest as data on true market value.
-
Re-enter at premium and guard boundaries to avoid re-markdowns.
Full-Price Career, Full-Voice Value
The path out of the clearance section is not bravado; it is structure.
Document value so memory can’t minimize it. Set boundaries so adrenaline can’t override them. Speak plainly, ask unapologetically, and bring others along. Keep evidence flowing so each conversation rests on facts, not favors.
Offers are not judgments of worth; they are starting points in a professional dialogue that expects skillful counters. Step into that dialogue with receipts and resolve, and watch compensation, scope, and confidence align with the work already being done.
That’s the shift—from discounted to full-price, from whispered value to value that is seen, named, and paid.